Legal Opinion

CASTRO-LOPEZ

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2015No. ID 3854PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

26 I&N Dec. 693

(BIA 2015) Interim Decision #3854 Matter of Miguel Angel CASTRO-LOPEZ, Respondent Decided December 2, 2015 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals The 10 years of continuous physical presence required by

8 C.F.R. § 1240.66(c)(2) (2015) for aliens seeking special rule cancellation of removal under section 203 of the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act,

Pub. L. No. 105-100,

tit. II, 111 Stat. 2160, 2193, 2196 (1997), amended by

Pub. L. No. 105-139, 111

Stat. 2644 (1997), should be measured from the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. ROMALEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
  4. Louie King Fong v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  5. Eugenio Cuadra v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jose Ramirez v. Jefferson Sessions IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  2. Manuel Campos-Hernandez v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Jose Pena v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Jose Ramirez v. Jefferson Sessions IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API