Legal Opinion

EDWIN PINEDA BARRIENTOS v. ROSEMARY NDOH

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 19, 2025No. 2:20-cv-02234Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWIN PINEDA BARRIENTOS, No. 2:20-cv-02234-DJC-EFB (HC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 ROSEMARY NDOH, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this petition for a writ of 18 habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He challenges his 2017 convictions for violating California 19 Penal Code § 288.7, sexual intercourse and sodomy of a child under 10 years of age. ECF No. 1 20 at 1; ECF No. 1-1 at 1. The claim that proceeds in petitioner’s second amended…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API