Hansen v. Jones
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Knous
An action for money had and received. Herein we shall refer to the parties by name or as they appeared in the trial court, where plaintiffs in error were defendants and the defendant in error was plaintiff.
Plaintiff and his assignor are brothers. Defendant Hansen is their uncle. Hansen was a cattle grower. From time to time in the past, plaintiff and his brother had been given a few head of cattle by relatives, in-eluding Hansen. As a matter of convenience this gift stock and their increase were run with the Hansen herd. By way of compensation for such accommodation the boys performed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. FajardoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Brooke v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
- Chesnut v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- Grand Valley Irrigation Co. v. Fruita Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Schleier v. BonellaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Capek v. MonahanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Samson v. Western Capital Partners LLC (In re Blixseth)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2013
- Entrup v. State of Colo.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Avery v. City of Fort CollinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Carlson v. BentonColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.