Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Evans

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 28, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court Dallas County; Kenneth Foree, Judge. Action by W. M. Arnold against W. D. Evans. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, C. J.

This is a boundary suit to determine the line between lots 17 and 18 in the city of Dallas. Appellant claims lot IS, and alleges, in effect, that appellee has taken possession of a strip running the full length of the line, being 2.8 feet wide at the front end and 3.5 feet at the hack end. Ap-pellee pleaded the general issue and the 10-year statute of limitation. The case was tried by the court without a jury and a judgment rendered in favor of appellee, .from which this appeal is prosecuted.

The trial court found that appellee had acquired title to the strip by virtue of the 10-year statute…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Turner v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Bowles v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Alexander v. Schleicher CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Bundick v. Moore-Cortes Canal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. O'Connor v. PresswoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API