Legal Opinion

Ford v. Kurtz

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1950No. 3256PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFPAUIR, Judge Ad Hoc.

The plaintiff’s minor son, Charles Arthur Ford, employee of the defendant, Otto Kurtz, doing business as O. K. Grocery & Market, sustained accidental injuries on September 17, 1949, while the said minor employee was engaged in the course and scope of his master’s employment. The employment was admittedly hazardous, and the accident and injuries were in all respects, covered by the Employers’ Liability Act,-Act No. 20 of 1914, as amended, our Compensation Act. The circumstances of the accident were that while the minor employee was engaged in the delivery of merchandise…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. McDonoughLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Richmond v. Employers' Liability Assur. CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crabtree v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Geter v. Travelers Insurance Company of HartfordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Compton v. North River Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Kistner v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Mitchell v. AbernathyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API