Legal Opinion

Arthur A. Kelcey v. Tankers Company Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 22, 1954No. 77, Docket 23140PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. Plaintiff filed a complaint, on February 5, 1951, alleging defendant’s liability for an attack on plaintiff by a fellow seaman, which occurred in January, 1949, on defendant’s vessel, Mission San Francisco. At the opening of the trial, on December 22, 1953, the trial judge, over defendant’s objection, allowed an amendment of the complaint which alleged .that the attack occurred. on de*543fendant’s vessel, U.S.N.T. Tomahawk on April 21, 1948.1 Defendant argues that the judge erred, because the amendment asserted a new cause of action which, on December 22, 1953, was barred…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Callen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Keen v. Overseas Tankship Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Boudoin v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Zeh v. WheelerIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Holdridge v. Heyer-Schulte Corp. of Santa BarbaraDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1977
  4. In Re Commonwealth Oil/Tesoro Petroleum Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1979
  5. Sword Line, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API