Legal Opinion

United States v. Joe Philip Maestas

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 23, 1991No. 90-1875PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Circuit Judge:

A jury convicted Joe Philip Maestas of being a convicted felon who knowingly and unlawfully possessed a firearm in and affecting interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). Maes-tas raises two arguments on appeal. First, he contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress the firearm because the police officer had insufficient cause to perform a warrantless search. Second, he contends that the introduction at trial, of evidence that he pled guilty in state court to a misdemeanor for carrying the same firearm that was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. AyalaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Felix Julian CardonaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Wayne BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. State v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. People v. McKinstreySupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API