United States v. Joe Philip Maestas
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Circuit Judge:
A jury convicted Joe Philip Maestas of being a convicted felon who knowingly and unlawfully possessed a firearm in and affecting interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). Maes-tas raises two arguments on appeal. First, he contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress the firearm because the police officer had insufficient cause to perform a warrantless search. Second, he contends that the introduction at trial, of evidence that he pled guilty in state court to a misdemeanor for carrying the same firearm that was…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. AyalaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Felix Julian CardonaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Wayne BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- People v. McKinstreySupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.