Legal Opinion

Loew's, Inc. v. Martin

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided December 6, 1949No. Civ. Nos. 26439-26442PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

These are motions to dismiss because of lack of jurisdiction.

*145Involved are four actions with different plaintiffs but the same defendants. Plain? tiffs are motion picture distributors and defendants operate the Dayton Theater in Akron, Ohio. Films were licensed by plaintiffs to defendants on a percentage of gross admissions or a flat rate basis. The percentage return allegedly served as the basis for the flat rate license. Plaintiffs allege that defendants defrauded and conspired to defraud plaintiffs to their damage by falsifying the gross admissions on percentage rentals.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. G. & P. Amusement Co. v. Regent Theater Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949
  3. Columbia Pictures Corporation v. RogersDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1949
  4. Loew's Inc. v. MakinsonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mary G. Roebling v. Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  2. Bankers Life & Casualty Company v. Nomie M. NamieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  3. Maresca v. MarksTexas Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API