Loew's Inc. v. Makinson
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Judge.
These are actions for damages based on the fraudulent conduct of defendants in their contractual relationships with the plaintiffs. There are seven related cases but the motions of defendants are the same in each case and can be treated as if but one action were involved.
Defendants have moved for a more definite statement and for a bill of particulars. Motion for a bill of particulars was abolished by the 1948 amendments, so the motions of defendants will be treated as a motion for a more definite statement.
Plaintiffs have agreed to amend their petition to state whether the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. KrejciCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Brady v. GamesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sky Technology Partners, LLC v. Midwest Research InstituteDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Marion Simcox v. San Juan Shipyard, Inc., Etc., International Shipbuilding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. JaffursDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- Loew's, Inc. v. MartinDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949
- United States v. Koch Bros. Bag Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.