Stephens v. Richardson
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandamus requiring the State Treasurer to cancel unsold highway bonds. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Petitioners pray for writ of mandate directed to the state treasurer requiring him to cancel certain bonds of the state of California prepared by him pursuant to the provisions of section 2 of article XVI of the constitution of the state of California, which authorized the issuance and sale of forty thousand bonds of one thousand dollars each. Petitioners' prayer is based upon the amendment to the constitution adopted by the people of the state at the election November 2, 1920, wherein a new section, number 3, was added to article XVI of the constitution, which provided, among other things,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Christensen v. CramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mitchell v. StephensDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1922
- Ellis v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921