Legal Opinion

Emerick v. Braucht

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County

Decided August 15, 1928No. 127Published

1Opinion of the Court

Fleming, P. J.,

This matter arises from the trial of a feigned issue between the parties. The plaintiff, George H. Ernerick, was the owner of a farm at Potters Mills, this county, and on or about April 1, 1921, leased the farm to Roland Zettle. At the same time and subsequently, the plaintiff became surety for the said Zettle, both on notes and in other ways, in a desire to help Zettle secure equipment for farming.. The said Zettle was also indebted to the defendant, Dr. H. S. Braucht, by way of an unpaid note upon which the defendant was an endorser and which he was subsequently required to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. White v. GunnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Renninger v. Spatz, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1889
  3. Werner v. ZierfussSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Bowersox v. Weigle & MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Garretson v. Hackenberg, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Potter County1891

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API