Legal Opinion

Howell v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided July 1, 1992No. CIV. 92-0139-HBPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRATTON, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Having considered the motion, memoranda in support and in opposition, and the applicable law, the Court finds that the motion pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) is well-taken and should be granted.

In his amended complaint, plaintiff challenges the authority of the Corps to issue a “cease and desist” letter. In the letter, defendant DeBow, the District Engineer, advised plaintiff that defendant Wood had determined plaintiffs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Ash Creek Mining Co. v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Hoffman Group, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Route 26 Land Development Ass'n v. United States GovernmentDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stewart v. PottsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
  2. Child v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1994
  3. Rueth v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Laguna Gatuna, Inc. v. BrownerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. Laguna Gatuna, Inc. v. BrownerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API