Legal Opinion

Tommy & Tina, Inc. v. Department of Consumer Affairs

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold Tompkins, J.

In this article 78 proceeding in the nature of certiorari, petitioners seek a review of respondent’s revocation of petitioners’ common show licenses for the operation of video games. The proceeding involves the issue of the constitutionality of a Department of Consumer Affairs regulation governing the city’s licensing of common shows as defined in section B32-40.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York. Video games are common shows as defined in the Administrative Code. For the reason set forth herein, this court finds the regulation…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Interactive Dig. Software v. St. Louis County, Mo.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2002
  2. Price v. New York City Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 2007
  3. American Amusement MacHine Ass'n v. KendrickDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
  4. Melron Amusement Corp. v. Town of MamaroneckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. All Weather Carting Corp. v. Town Board of IslipNew York Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API