American Amusement MacHine Ass'n v. Kendrick
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
HAMILTON, District Judge.
Introduction and Summary
' The First Amendment does not prohibit states from restricting children’s access to pornography even though adults’ access to the same sexually explicit materials may not be restricted. See Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U.S. 629, 88 S.Ct. 1274, 20 L.Ed.2d 195 (1968). This case presents questions about the extension of this rule of First Amendment law to video games with images of graphic violence. Indianapolis General Ordinance No. 72-2000 restricts the display and operation of coin-operated amusement…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wilson v. Midway Games, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
- Interactive Dig. Software v. St. Louis County, Mo.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2002