Legal Opinion

American Amusement MacHine Ass'n v. Kendrick

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided October 11, 2000No. IP00-1321-C-H/GPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

HAMILTON, District Judge.

Introduction and Summary

' The First Amendment does not prohibit states from restricting children’s access to pornography even though adults’ access to the same sexually explicit materials may not be restricted. See Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U.S. 629, 88 S.Ct. 1274, 20 L.Ed.2d 195 (1968). This case presents questions about the extension of this rule of First Amendment law to video games with images of graphic violence. Indianapolis General Ordinance No. 72-2000 restricts the display and operation of coin-operated amusement…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Midway Games, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
  2. Interactive Dig. Software v. St. Louis County, Mo.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API