Legal Opinion

In re Spurling

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 22, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Clarence H. Spurling appeals the order of a single justice of the Supreme Judicial Court {Brody, J.) denying his petition for admission to the bar on the ground that Spurling failed to meet his burden of satisfying the court that he possessed the good moral character required for admission. We find no merit in Spurling’s contention that the court erred in allowing the Board of Bar Examiners (the Board) and J. Scott Davis, Esq., as its counsel, to participate in the hearing on his petition. Nor is there merit in his contention that the burden of proof shifted to the Board after Spurling’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harmon v. EmersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. Application of FeingoldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  3. Board of Overseers of the Bar v. DineenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  4. Chequinn Corporation v. MullenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
  5. State v. FrancoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re JonasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  2. Petition of Edwin R. Jonas III for Reinstatement to the Bar of the State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  3. Ouellette v. AlbertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  4. Petition of Edwin R. Jonas III for Reinstatement to the Bar of the State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  5. In re JonasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API