Wiles v. Wiles
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Equity Side of Frederick county court. The appellant, Susan Wiles, anterior to and at the time of her marriage with the appellee, Tilghman B. Wiles, was the owner of a promissory note, executed to her in her then maiden name of Susan Baker, by the appellee, Christian Ramsburg, to the. amount of $958, of which $100 principal and,all the interest, up to- the 26th of November 1849, had been paid.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Equity Side of Frederick county court. The appellant, Susan Wiles, anterior to and at the time of her marriage with the appellee, Tilghman B. Wiles, was the owner of a promissory note, executed to her in her then maiden name of Susan Baker, by the appellee, Christian Ramsburg, to the. amount of $958, of which $100 principal and,all the interest, up to- the 26th of November 1849, had been paid. On the 20th of September 1849, after the marriage and birth of a child, the husband, Tilghman B. Wiles, applied for the benefit of the insolvent laws, and John H. Keller, the other…
1Opinion of the CourtLe Grand, C. J.
There is no dispute in regard to the facts in this case. The bill, in substance, states, — and its allegations are admitted by the answers and the agreement filed in the cause — that the appellant, at the time and prior to her marriage with the defendant, Wiles, was the owner of a chose in action, due and owing to her by the defendant, Ramsburg; that after the marriage and the birth of a child, her husband, on the 20th day of September 1849, applied for the benefit of the insolvent laws, and that the defendant, Keller, was appointed his permanent trustee. The bill also states, that Wiles is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Carter v. DennisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1848
3Cited by2 opinions
- Langston v. LangstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Schindel v. SchindelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1858