Legal Opinion
Jenkins v. City of Ruston
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided September 19, 2019No. 3:17-cv-00963Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION CHELSEA DANIELLE JENKINS, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-0963 VERSUS JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR. CITY OF RUSTON, ET AL. MAGISTRATE JUDGE HAYES MEMORANDUM RULING Before the Court is a Rule 12(b)(1) Motion, Rule 12(c) Motion, and Rule 56 Motion for Summary Judgment (Record Document 26) filed by Defendants, the City of Ruston and the Ruston City Police Department. Plaintiffs Chelsea and Brittany Jenkins oppose the motion. See Record Document 30. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ claims against the Ruston City…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.