Legal Opinion
Furfari v. Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 14, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2020-2424Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANTHONY FURFARI, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-2424 (CKK) PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (July 14, 2021) This case involves Mr. Anthony Furfari’s claim that he is entitled to a disability pension guaranteed by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”). Mr. Furfari first pursued his claim through administrative proceedings before the PBGC, but on April 18, 2018, the PBGC Appeals Board issued a final decision denying Mr. Furfari’s benefit claim. Mr. Furfari now seeks judicial review of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.