Legal Opinion

Zarro v. Hasbro, Inc.

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided October 10, 2012No. C.A. No. 12-38LPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RONALD R. LAGUEUX, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment on Plaintiff Anthony Zarro’s claims that he has been wrongfully denied pension benefits in violation of the Employee Retirement Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”). Pursuant to ERISA’s Section 503, 29 U.S.C. § 1133, as well as the terms of the subject ERISA plan, Defendant Hasbro, Inc. Teamsters Pension Plan, (hereinafter the “Hasbro Plan”), Plaintiff has completed two internal appeals of his benefits denial with the Plan Administrator.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Doyle v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  5. Recupero v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holt v. Raytheon Technologies CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API