Royston v. Scottsdale, City of

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Nichol Royston, No. CV-22-00542-PHX-SMB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 City of Scottsdale, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Before the Court is Defendant City of Scottsdale’s Motion for Summary Judgment 16 (Doc. 51) and the required Statement of Facts (Doc. 48) on Plaintiff Nichol Royston’s 17 claims for discrimination and retaliation under the Americans with Disabilities Act 18 (“ADA”), the Rehabilitation Act (“RA”), Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), and 19 Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”)…