Legal Opinion
State v. Forbes
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
Decided December 19, 1995PublishedCited by 240 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARKER, Judge.
The appellants, Jane Forbes and Richard Canady, appeal from judgments of conviction entered in Hickman County Circuit Court. Forbes was convicted of fabricating evidence in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-16-503(a)(2), a class C felony, and she was sentenced to three years of probation, two hundred hours of community service, and a $5,000 fine. 1 Canady was convicted of aggravated perjury in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-16-703(a), a class D felony, and he was sen-fenced to two years of probation and one hundred hours of community…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. CabbageTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by240 opinions
- State v. HodgesTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. VannTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. GoltzCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
- State v. DellingerTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
235 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.