Legal Opinion

Social Circle Cotton Mill Co. v. Ransom

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 19, 1919No. 9917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action for damages; from Walton superior court—Judge Cobb. May 15, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

1. Applications for a new trial on the ground <~f newly discovered evidence are not favored by the courts (Burge *606v. State, 133 Ga. 431, 66 S. E. 243), and a new trial will not be granted on such a ground where it appears- that the alleged newly discovered evidence tends merely to impeach a witness for the plaintiff. Civil Code, § 6086; Bragg v. State, 15 Ga. App. 368 (83 S. E. 274); Williams v. State, 138 Ga. 825 (76 S. E. 347); Wimms v. State, 135 Ga. 659 (70 S. E. 254); Bowers v. State, 135 Ga. 310 (69 S. E. 536), and numerous other cases. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. LanierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  4. Wrightsville & Tennille Railroad v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. WeatherbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. White v. KnappCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Kiker v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Benton Rapid Express Inc. v. SammonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API