Legal Opinion

State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund v. Logging

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1992No. 91-197PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

Appellant Lee Rost Logging (Rost) is a logging business in Bigfork. A hearing officer for the Department of Labor and Industry determined that Rost did not have to pay workers’ compensation insurance premiums on payments made to employees reimbursing them for the use of their pickup trucks. The hearing officer also determined that Rost had made excessive payroll deductions for payments to employees which reimbursed them for the use of their chain saws. On appeal, the Workers’ Compensation Court reversed the hearing officer on the issue of pickup rentals and affirmed on the issue of saw…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. DesayeMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. City of Billings v. Billings Firefighters Local No. 521Montana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Western Cottonoil Company v. J. C. Hodges and Mary WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Total Mechanical Heating & Air Conditioning v. EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS DIVISIONMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Weitz v. Montana Department of Natural ResourcesMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Weber v. Public Employees' Retirement BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Tungsten Holdings, Inc. v. OlsonMontana Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API