Legal Opinion

Curreri v. Vice

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 2, 1935No. 7722Published

1Opinion of the Court

77 F.2d 130 (1935)

CURRERI

v.

VICE, United States Marshal, et al.

No. 7722.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 2, 1935.

Hugh L. Smith, Charles J. Wiseman, and James F. Brennan, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

H. H. McPike, U. S. Atty., and A. J. Zirpoli, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee Vice.

Leo A. Cunningham, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee Fitzgerald.

Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, Vincent Butler, Jr., and Harold I. Boucher, all of San Francisco, Cal., for British Consul General of San Francisco, Cal., amici curiæ.

Before WILBUR, DENMAN, and MATHEWS,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Collins v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Charlton v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Factor v. LaubenheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Grin v. ShineSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API