Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Randall Ford, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief Judge.
Randall Ford, Inc. (“Randall Ford”) has filed a motion to compel discovery (Doc. 22) pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Randall Ford requested in discovery that Doyle Martin (“Martin”) execute releases permitting Randall Ford to obtain Martin’s medical and employment records. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“the EEOC”) objected to the discovery request stating that Martin’s medical and employment records that it deemed relevant and discoverable would be produced.1
In the instant motion, Randall Ford argues…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Thorman & Wright Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dirkzwager v. Archer-Daniels-Midland CompanyDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2022
- Domino Two, LLC v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Crain Automotive Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2024
- Herzig v. Arkansas Foundation For Medical Care, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2018
- Pearson v. Royal Canin USA, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2023