Legal Opinion
Pearson v. Royal Canin USA, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided September 11, 2023No. 4:22-cv-04018Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION BRIAN PEARSON, 4:22-CV-04018-KES Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S vs. MOTIONS TO QUASH ROYAL CANIN USA, INC., DOCKET NOS. 21 & 27 Defendants. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the court on the complaint of plaintiff Brian Pearson alleging damages caused by defendant Royal Canin USA, Inc.’s racial discrimination and retaliation during employment, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. See Docket No. 1, ¶ 1. This court has original…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gaylon Hofer v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Detroit Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Wegener v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.