State v. Bartlett
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
GLASSMAN, Justice.
Following a jury-waived trial, James F. Bartlett, Jr. appeals from the judgments entered in the Superior Court (Sagadahoc County, Fritzsche, J.) on the court’s finding that Bartlett was guilty of three counts of gross sexual misconduct, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253 (1983 & Supp.1988), amended by P.L. 1989, ch. 401, § A, 4, and two counts of gross sexual assault, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253 (Supp. 1994). 1 Bartlett contends that the testimony of the victim at the trial of this case was not sufficiently credible to permit the court ra tionally to find beyond a reasonable doubt all of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Albert H. Rothrock and Vivian S. RothrockCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- State v. MacKenzieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
- Qualey v. FultonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Hersum v. Kennebec Water DistrictSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rutland v. MullenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- State v. MillikenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- State v. GreenleafSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- In Re CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- State v. CrossmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.