Legal Opinion
In re: Avandia Marketing v.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 15, 2019No. 18-2259 & 18-2656PublishedCited by 305 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Chief Judge.
Following a decision of the District Court granting summary judgment to GlaxoSmithKline LLC ("GSK"), the losing parties, two health benefit plans, appealed from that final order. 1 While briefing the appeal, the parties sought to include in their joint appendix certain documents filed in connection with the summary judgment proceedings. GSK had previously designated some of these documents as confidential and contended that they should remain so on appeal; the plans disagreed. That led GSK to ask the District Court, on two occasions and pursuant to the applicable protective…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of OnondagaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by305 opinions
- In re: Avandia Marketing v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Depuy Synthes Products, Inc. v. Veterinary Orthopedic ImplantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Wagner Ex Rel. Wagner-Garay v. Fort Wayne Community SchoolsDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2003
- Merry Reed v. Kevin DevlinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- NEW YORK TIMES CO. v. DIST. CT. (DOE 1 TRUST) (CIVIL)Nevada Supreme Court · 2025
300 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.