Legal Opinion

Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Royal Manor Apartments, LLC

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 29, 2014No. Case No. 13-12441Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING FANNIE MAE’S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. #21) AND GRANTING ROYAL MANOR’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 20)

VICTORIA A. ROBERTS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a mortgage foreclosure action; Defendant Royal Manor Apartments, LLC (“Royal Manor”) does not dispute that foreclosure was legal: Royal Manor defaulted by not making the final payment, but timely redeemed the property after Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) filed its Complaint seeking injunctive relief and appointment of a receiver.

This dispute centers on the redemption price paid by Royal Manor,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API