Legal Opinion

Compton v. Elkhorn Valley Drainage District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1933No. 28472PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDean, J.

This action was begun in the district court for Douglas county by Arthur D. Compton against the Elkhorn Valley Drainage District to recover for damages to crops on lands owned by him in 1923, 1924, and 1925, alleged to have been caused by reason of an overflow of water thereon through the negligence of the defendant district. Upon the death of Compton, the action was revived in the name of his widow, Mary Esther Compton, the plaintiff herein.

Under three causes of action, the jury found for the plaintiff in the following sums, namely, $1,200 for damage to 360 acres of corn in 1923; $4,500 for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harris v. Lincoln & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Murphy v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Brown v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1912
  4. Compton v. Elkhorn Valley Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Sanitary District No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Faught v. Dawson County Irrigation Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Webb v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Seibold v. WhippleNebraska Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API