Fulgham v. Bendy
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Tyler. Tried below before the Hon. James M. Maxcy. The facts sufficiently appear from the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
This is a'suit upon a note given by the appellant to De Yeuve, which is alleged to have been transferred, for a valuable consideration, to Bendy. The defence is, that it was given in the purchase of a tract of land, and that the appellant was induced to give it by the false and fraudulent represéntations of De Yeuve, that he had full authority, as the agent and attorney of Cook and Curtis, to sell the said land, by which the appellant was deceived and defrauded. And that Bendy had notice, &c.
A bill of exceptions shows that the appellant, having given Bendy notice to produce the power of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hutchins v. WadeTexas Supreme Court · 1857
- Galbreath v. TempletonTexas Supreme Court · 1857
- DeCordova v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1849
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lockett v. SchurenbergTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Pfeuffer v. MaltbyTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- Ivy v. IvyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- McCarty v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Pruitt v. BlesiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.