Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Continental Geophysical Co. v. Adair

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 27, 1967No. 5-4319Published

1ConcurrenceJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

I concur in the majority opinion and its disposition of the case. My concurrence in the remand of the case is not for the reasons stated in the majority opinion, however. In view of my dissent from the remand in St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Clemons, 242 Ark. 707, 415 S. W. 2d 332, I feel that I should express my reasons for this concurrence.

There is direct precedent for remanding a case in which judgment based on a jury verdict is reversed for insufficiency of the evidence to support it. The touchstone for the departure from the usual disposition in such case is that there he some…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ClemonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  2. Reynolds Metal Co. v. BallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API