Legal Opinion

Reynolds Metal Co. v. Ball

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 12, 1950No. 4-9108PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeflar, J.

This is an action for damages to plaintiff’s farm and pasture land, located on Hurricane Creek some six or seven miles below the alumina extraction plant1 of defendant Reynolds Metal Co. (hereinafter called Reynolds). The damage to the land was caused by sediment deposited on it during overflows of Hurricane Creek following heavy rains. Plaintiff alleged that this sediment either came from the Reynolds plant or contained poisonous substances which came from the plant. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence and again at the close of all the evidence the defendant moved for a directed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arminius Chemical Co. v. LandrumSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
  2. Nebo Consolidated Coal & Coking Co. v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Good v. West Mining Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Douglas v. FranksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hayes Bros. Flooring Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  2. Milum v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  3. Continental Geophysical Co. v. AdairSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ClemonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ClemonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API