Legal Opinion

Ryckman v. Johnson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1934No. 24796. Department OnePublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Millard, J. —

This is an action to recover damages claimed to have been sustained by reason of false and fraudulent representations made by the defendants to induce the exchange and purchase of real estate. From judgment on the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, the defendants have appealed.

This cause was once before in this court. Ryckman v. Johnson, 161 Wash. 568, 297 Pac. 206. The first appeal was from a judgment on the verdict in favor of plaintiff. That judgment was reversed, with direction to grant a new trial, “because of the lack of any evidence of values upon which the verdict could…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stoke v. ConverseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. Likes v. BaerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  3. Edwards v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Jones v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Elliott v. WheelockWashington Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ryckman v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Sova v. First Nat. Bk. of FerndaleWashington Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API