Dolezal v. Cleveland, Canton & Columbus Motor Freight Co.

*668OPINION

By DRUCKER, J.

The mere recital of the facts of this case-leaves no doubt as to the liability of the defendant. The only controversial element relates to the measure of damages and raises an inquiry as to whether the extent of the carrier’s liability is to be determined solely by a rule of a property law, — that is, that a bailee for hire is liable-for the value of misdelivered goods as of the time of conversion, or whether t&at liability is a broader one under the contract herein involved.

The failure of the buyer in this case to make the contracted payments for the first four shipments…