Legal Opinion

Bull v. Kelley

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1910No. 16,757PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Gray district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.

The appellants, Naylor and Hollembeak, sought to enjoin the collection of taxes levied by the city of Cimarron upon tracts of land owned by them and claimed to be outside the city limits. Some of the land affected was discharged from the levy, and this appeal is taken from the judgment of the district court *598holding the remainder to be within the city limits and therefore subject to city taxes.

The initial question is one of statutory interpretation. In 1889 the legislature, by an omnibus act, vacated portions of more than sixty town sites.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Topeka v. GillettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Cole v. DorrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Levitt v. City of WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  4. Kansas Town & Land Co. v. City of Smith CenterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897
  5. Davenport v. HamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harvest Queen Mill & Elevator Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  2. Incorporation of Olsburg v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Patrick v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Richter v. BurdockIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State ex rel. Brewster v. Mayor of LawrenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API