City of Los Angeles v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Plaintiff Edison’s Standing
COLLINS, District Judge.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of Plaintiff Southern California Edison Company’s standing came on regularly for hearing before this Court on December 23, 1996. After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties, argument of counsel, and the case file, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.
I. Introduction
This case arises from a dispute between the parties concerning the government’s environmental approval of one of two competing crude oil pipeline…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kanoa Inc. v. ClintonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1998