Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wissler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1983No. 27Published

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Is an attempt to assassinate a well known public figure and religious leader an event which mandates the granting of a mistrial in an unrelated armed robbery case then being tried? The trial court denied a defense motion for mistrial when the jury became aware, during the noon recess on May 13, 1982, that Pope John Paul II had been the subject of an assassination attempt. The jury subsequently found Cris Wissler guilty of armed robbery. We find no error in the trial court’s ruling and affirm the judgment of sentence.

A decision to grant or refuse a motion for mistrial is within…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ContiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. PottsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. United States v. Eric R. Clarke, in No. 14805, and Horace R. Johnson, in No. 14806Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  4. Commonwealth v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API