United States v. Eric R. Clarke, in No. 14805, and Horace R. Johnson, in No. 14806
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
Following a jury trial, the defendants, practicing physicians, were found guilty of conspiring to violate the federal narcotic laws 1 and making unlawful sales of narcotics drugs. 2
They prosecute their appeals on the grounds that (1) the trial judge erred in refusing to withdraw a juror following testimony of a government witness with respect to prior, unrelated unlawful narcotic sales by the defendant Clarke, and (2) the defense of entrapment was established as a matter of law in the government’s case.
The appeals followed the trial judge’s denial of the defendants’…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hopt v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Throckmorton v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gratton Earl Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Schiller TotoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Eddie Odom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. De LarosaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.