Legal Opinion

United States v. Eric R. Clarke, in No. 14805, and Horace R. Johnson, in No. 14806

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 31, 1965No. 14806_1PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, Circuit Judge.

Following a jury trial, the defendants, practicing physicians, were found guilty of conspiring to violate the federal narcotic laws 1 and making unlawful sales of narcotics drugs. 2

They prosecute their appeals on the grounds that (1) the trial judge erred in refusing to withdraw a juror following testimony of a government witness with respect to prior, unrelated unlawful narcotic sales by the defendant Clarke, and (2) the defense of entrapment was established as a matter of law in the government’s case.

The appeals followed the trial judge’s denial of the defendants’…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Hopt v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Throckmorton v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gratton Earl Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  3. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Schiller TotoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  4. Eddie Odom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. United States v. De LarosaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API