Legal Opinion

Postorino v. Schrope

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1990No. Civ. A. 88-7686PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TROUTMAN, Senior District Judge.

This diversity case involves a personal injury claim by the plaintiff, a pedestrian, who was allegedly struck by defendant Schrope’s car in the parking lot of an Allentown, Pennsylvania, Laneco supermarket while plaintiff was engaged in his duties as a Laneco employee.

Defendants have moved to exclude evidence of plaintiff’s medical expenses and wage loss from the trial of the case, scheduled to commence May 7, 1990. Defendants base their motion in limine upon the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL), 75 Pa. Cons. Stat.Ann. §…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hertel v. Parke, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County1987
  2. Reeder v. Young, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fulmer v. Com., Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Palmosina v. Laidlaw Transit Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Davish v. GidleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Davish v. GidleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Geiswite v. Warner, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clinton County1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API