Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Howlow

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 10, 2001No. Nos. 00-55926, 01-55301; D.C. No.CV-99-1074 CBM (Ajws)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Howlow Limited Partnership appeals various orders arising from a judicial foreclosure action closed by civil minute order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1291, and affirm the district court’s orders.

Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we will not recite them in detail except as necessary.

In case No. 00-55926, Howlow argues that the district court erred by holding that Ford Credit was entitled to the rents collected after Ford Credit filed an action for a preliminary injunction and appoint-*788merit of a receiver. We review this question of law de…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Weissman v. Quail Lodge Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Russian River Watershed Protection Committee Brenda Adelman v. City of Santa RosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Steven A. Diamond v. City of Taft, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API