Legal Opinion
Errigo v. Diomede
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided January 19, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*989OPINION OF THE COURT
George M. Heymann, J.
Petitioners commenced this holdover proceeding by service of a 30-day notice of termination, on or about March 22, 2006, electing to terminate the respondent’s tenancy on April 30, 2006. The respondent, who is 94 years old, resides in the top floor apartment of a three-family dwelling located at 85 Woodhull Street, Brooklyn, New York 11231.
On July 20, 2006, the parties and their attorneys entered into a “so ordered” stipulation which provided for a final judgment of possession, warrant to issue forthwith, execution stayed through December 31, 2006, at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- ATM One, LLC v. LandaverdeNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Iltit Associates v. SternerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Joseph v. CheeseboroCivil Court of the City of New York · 1964
- Central Brooklyn Urban Development Corp. v. CopelandCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
- Joseph v. CheeseboroAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. OliverNassau County District Court · 2009