Legal Opinion
PATELL INDUS. MACH. v. Toyoda MacHinery USA
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided March 30, 1995No. 5:93-cv-01572PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
880 F.Supp. 96 (1995)
PATELL INDUSTRIAL MACHINE CO., INC., Plaintiff
v.
TOYODA MACHINERY U.S.A., INC., Defendant.
Civ. No. 93-CV-1572.
United States District Court, N.D. New York.
March 30, 1995.
Phillips, Lytle, Hitchcock Blaine & Huber, Rochester, NY, for plaintiff (Gregory M. Trusso, of counsel).
Martin, Martin & Woodard, Syracuse, NY, for defendant (Winthrop H. Thurlow, of counsel).
DECISION AND ORDER
SCULLIN, District Judge:
INTRODUCTION
Presently before the court is defendant Toyoda Machinery U.S.A., Inc.'s ("Toyoda") motion for partial summary judgment as to three of the four causes of action…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Brown v. LockwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Mallis v. Bankers Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Grumman Allied Industries, Inc. And Grumman Corporation v. Rohr Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dimon Inc. v. Folium, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC v. Sub-Technical, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2019