Conrad's Adm'r v. Fuller
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of the city of Danville, pronounced at its Flay term, 1898, in a suit in chancery, wherein the appellees were the complainants, and the appellants were the defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.
The court is of opinion that the amended and supplemental bill cannot be maintained against P. T. Conrad as surviving partner of himself and Charles H. Conrad, in the two concerns of Charles H. Conrad & Co. and J. M. Conrad’s Sons.
The object of the original bill, which was filed by the widow of O. H. Conrad and one of his children against his administrator and other children, was to have a settlement of the decedent’s estate, and a distribution thereof, after the payment of his debts, and a partition of his real estate.
The amended and supplemental bill made the surviving partners of three…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Horton v. BondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877
- Piedmont & Arlington Life Insurance v. MaurySupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
- Beverly v. RhodesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
- Beaty v. DowningSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
- Norvell v. LittleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Saunders v. Bank of MecklenburgSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
- Austin v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
- Evans v. SpurginSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
- Harris v. Shield'sSupreme Court of Virginia · 1911
- Nickels' Adm'r v. HorsleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.