Legal Opinion

Tak Chun Gaming Promotion Company Limited v. Long

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 2023No. B317918MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 11/17/23 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO TAK CHUN GAMING B317918 PROMOTION COMPANY LIMITED, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. Plaintiff and Appellant, 21BBCV00094) v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING KEVIN C.S. LONG, REHEARING Defendant and NO CHANGE IN THE Respondent. JUDGMENT THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on October 26, 2023, be modified as follows: 1. On page 11, in lines 5 and 6 of footnote 4, delete the phrase “Tak Chun distastefully implies”…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Griffin v. McCoachSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp.California Supreme Court · 2016
  5. People v. GiordanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API