Legal Opinion

Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. Hofberger

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 23, 1976No. 75-277PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

Aero Mayflower Transit Company sued Jack Hofberger to recover $1,517.76 for moving household goods from Hillsdale, Michigan to El Dorado, Arkansas. This appeal comes from a judgment in favor of appellee by the circuit judge, trial by jury having been waived. We find no error and affirm.

Hofberger was employed by Permaneer Corporation in Hillsdale. He accepted employment by El Dorado Industries at El Dorado, Arkansas, with the understanding that the new employer would pay all relocation expenses. He obtained an estimate of the cost from the Mayflower Moving Service in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Illinois Steel Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Consolidated Freightways Corporation of Delaware v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Checker Van Lines v. Siltek International, Ltd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  3. Interstate Motor Freight System, Inc. v. Wright Brokerage Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API