Legal Opinion

State v. Garza

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 1, 1999No. 2 CA-CR 99-0185PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

¶ 1 After a bench trial, the trial court found appellant Cynthia Marie Garza guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, but simultaneously found the state had failed to prove the dangerous nature allegation and later sentenced Garza to a substantially mitigated term of 3.5 years’ imprisonment. Because there was sufficient evidence that Garza used a gun and placed the victim in reasonable apprehension of imminent physical injury and because the inconsistency in the court’s findings does not mandate reversal, we reject Garza’s challenges to the finding of guilt and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Harris v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. Joseph MayburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  3. State v. MathersArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. FulminanteArizona Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. GonzalezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. State v. MangumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. State v. ViramontesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API