Church v. Church
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Petition eor divorce.
1Opinion of the CourtTillinghast, J.
We are satisfied from the evidence adduced in this case that the respondent has been guilty of adultery as charged in the petition. We are also satisfied that the petitioner has, as is alleged in the recriminatory answer filed by the respondent, been guilty of extreme cruelty to tbe respondent, by profane and insulting language habitually used towards her, and by abusive physical violence upon her. In these circumstances should the petition be granted ?
The English rule, prior to the passage of Stat. 20 & 21 Vict, cap. 85, § 31, doubtless was, that cruelty could not be pleaded in bar to a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Conant v. ConantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Nagel v. NagelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1848
- Handy v. HandyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Clapp v. ClappMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Christianberry v. ChristianberryIndiana Supreme Court · 1833
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rusch Factors, Inc. v. LevinDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1968
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Balgowan Steamship Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Blankenship v. BlankenshipNevada Supreme Court · 1929
- Matheson v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.