Legal Opinion

In Re Jamie G.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 24, 1987No. H001738PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

196 Cal.App.3d 675 (1987)

241 Cal. Rptr. 869

In re JAMIE G., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

PEDRO SILVA, as Chief Probation Officer, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

HAZEL G. et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Docket No. H001738.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

November 24, 1987.

COUNSEL

Deanna F. Lamb and Robert Fiedler, under appointments by the Court of Appeal, for Defendants and Appellants.

Leo Himmelsbach, District Attorney, and Robert J. Masterson, Deputy District Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

CAPACCIOLI, J.

This case presents the issue of what…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & ReformSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Department of Social Services v. Ronald P.California Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Backlund v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Zacharia D.California Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re Kieshia E.California Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Alber v. Illinois Department of Mental Health & Developmental DisabilitiesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  4. Wittman v. SaenzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Orange County Social Services Agency v. Wendy H.California Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API