Legal Opinion

People v. Dinan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1962PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.

In affirming the judgments of conviction of these defendants on gambling indictments, we consider that the intercepted telephone conversations on which these convictions depend are not rendered inadmissible by recent Federal decisions. The other points raised do not require discussion. They have been examined carefully and resolved in favor of respondent.

In many criminal prosecutions evidence obtained by wire tapping authorized by orders granted under the New York State Constitution (art. I, § 12) and Code of Criminal Procedure (§ 813-a) has been introduced in criminal trials in New York…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. SpicaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. People v. AcevedoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. People v. DylaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. People v. CapolongoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Keller Construction Co. v. KashaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API